He is wrong. The law says motorcycles must be SPECIFICALLY excluded. So the sign would need to say "No motorcycles" or "Motorcycles prohibited". But note, this does NOT apply on motorwyas.
He is wrong. The law says motorcycles must be SPECIFICALLY excluded. So the sign would need to say "No motorcycles" or "Motorcycles prohibited". But note, this does NOT apply on motorwyas.
Originally Posted by skidmarkOriginally Posted by Phil Vincent
some cops just hate bikes , it`s a fact and he`s one of them, most of the people who hate bikes can`t ride em and thats a fact as well , does anyone disagree.
This guy clearly doesnt like you, if its not on the motorway, contest it and you should get off the ticket.Originally Posted by Hellraiser
"If you can't laugh at yourself, you're just not paying attention!"
"There is no limit to dumb."
"Resolve to live with all your might while you do live, and as you shall wish you had done ten thousand years hence."
I've only been pulled up once for riding in the motorway bus lanes, I said to the cop, as far as I am aware, it is legal, and I was polite and respectful, and he told me how it was, and said I wouldn't likely be chased if I split between lanes carefully.
The two annoying things though, firstly, the reason he got me, was because he had just pulled a car up... Onto the bus lane! yet his reasoning was, he didn't want to see a motorcyclist versus bus in the bus lane. (So its ok for a bus to take out a cop car, and someone suffering from a minor infraction, but not a motorbike)
The obvious other flaw. Buses are less than 5 per cent of traffic, and hence the bus lane sits empty for 95 per cent of the time. Safety obviously isn't the concern, It must be that the police are contracted to enforce the obligations the LTNZ sets forward. EG buses have precedence, as part of the incentivising program for public trasnport.
Damnably frustrating, and I still say, the only way I am using a bus, is if I am sitting in its lane. Thats my rant, and I'm sticking to it....
Hate dang buses, ggnnar!!
Boyd hh er Suzuki are my heroes!
The best deals, all the time!
In this case, odd though it is, LTNZ are not the bad guys. It is Transit NZ who are in charge of motorweays and insist that motorcyclists shall not use them
Transit NZ HATE (and I mean **HATE**) motorcycles.
Originally Posted by skidmarkOriginally Posted by Phil Vincent
The Moral of the story is,,, dont have a plate on ya bike,, and dont stop if a cop chases ya!!!'''unless ya ride a honda or other piece of crap"""hehehe
Na mate - the simplest and safest, and most legal is to put the visor UP - get a wet face but see clearly all the way to where you're going.Originally Posted by XP@
Normal splitting guidelines apply... but add in the consideration the road is wet (aka greasy) and most motorists don't know how to adjust their driving for wet conditions.
$2,000 cash if you find a buyer for my house, kumeuhouseforsale@straightshooters.co.nz for details
If it says "buses only" that's tantamount to a specific exclusion... even though technically it's "inclusive" .Originally Posted by Hellraiser
$2,000 cash if you find a buyer for my house, kumeuhouseforsale@straightshooters.co.nz for details
Bikes are not allowed to use this lane. That is a specific exclusion, buses only are old signs indicating bus lanes before the new legislation came out the allows other road users such as bikes to use them. Therefore they have to add to the signs if they want to follow their own silly law.Originally Posted by ManDownUnder
I quote from the regs. (LAND TRANSPORT (ROAD USER) RULE 2004 (1.6))
buslane means a lane reserved by a marking or sign installed at the start of the lane and at each point at which the lane resumes after an intersection for the use of—
a)buses; and
b)cycles, mopeds, and motorcycles (unless one or more are specifically excluded by the sign)
The word specifically means the sign must mention the word cycle, moped or motorcycle to exclude them.
"Bus lane "only"" is not specific, but implicit.
Some things are worth dying for, living is one of them.
Do you mean the "hard shoulder" or a bus lane on the motorway?Originally Posted by Ixion
Some things are worth dying for, living is one of them.
I think "Tanatamount to a specific exclusion" is an oxymoron. (note the non-edit of the original post to correct spelling)Originally Posted by ManDownUnder
Some things are worth dying for, living is one of them.
The "bus lanes" .Transit claim, (though I think the claim dubious, and untested in law - just don't m'self to be the first to test it), that their "bylaws" override the general law about bus lanes, and that "their" buslanes are not really bus lanes at all, but rather the hard shoulder, and they have given buses (only) a specific dispensation to the law forbidding vehicles to use the hard shoulder.Do you mean the "hard shoulder" or a bus lane on the motorway?
All very dodgy.But you will still get a ticket if you use them. I hope someone gets one and fights it. But I am no martyr.
The reality is that Transit HATE motorcycles, and would very much like us banned completely. the last thing they would ever do is agree to something that might make bikes attractive to cagers.
Originally Posted by skidmarkOriginally Posted by Phil Vincent
I say old chaps, remember those good old days of 5 horsepower motor perambulators and bloody revolutions... dear me what what what, have another cigar old chap
Death to all opposing worldviews!!! and Transit!!
Boyd hh er Suzuki are my heroes!
The best deals, all the time!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks