Originally Posted by mashman So you taint your conclusion by allowing the source to override content and context? Sounds like bloody hard work. No, but I certainly take it into account. It quickly becomes obvious what the motive is and whether the information or claims are valid.
You don't get to be an old dog without learning a few tricks. Shorai Powersports batteries are very trick!
Originally Posted by unstuck Says the man supporting some of the biggest drug dealers on the planet Shhhhh! Actually I only take what I need to stay above the ground and vertical. I would die without them, unlike those who take "illicit" drugs for kicks.
Originally Posted by Edbear No, but I certainly take it into account. It quickly becomes obvious what the motive is and whether the information or claims are valid. You mean the motive that you decide is evident/relevant lol... damned if ya do.
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!NOW Stupid, not NWO
Originally Posted by mashman V for Vendetta Speech I much preferred her work in this one.
Originally Posted by Katman I reminder distinctly . Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
Originally Posted by husaberg I much preferred her work in this one. Cobblers. Her secret came out but her tits didn't.
Originally Posted by jasonu Cobblers. Her secret came out but her tits didn't. Personally I'd rather see none of Natalie's and more of Mila's But its not a deal breaker.........
Originally Posted by husaberg Personally I'd rather see none of Natalie's and more of Mila's But its not a deal breaker.........
Physics; Thou art a cruel, heartless Bitch-of-a-Mistress
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Forum Rules
Bookmarks